
What is a Franchise Disclosure Document? Key Details Explained
Franchising is often seen as an easier way to start a business. But it still comes with serious legal and financial responsibility.
4 min read
The letter that ends a contract. Whether it works depends on which ground you are relying on, and terminating on the wrong one makes you the party in breach.
A few details, then secure checkout. Your expert takes it from there.
Prefer to talk to someone first?
The notice by which one party brings a contract to an end, and the ground it relies on to do so.
A termination of agreement is used mainly to end business contracts between buyers and sellers of goods or services. Where one party is not satisfied, whether with performance, with quality or with anything else the contract required, they send this notice to bring the agreement to an end. It is not limited to business contracts; any agreement can be terminated.
It is drafted on plain paper or on the company letterhead, addressed to the other party, and signed and authorised by the person ending it.
What decides whether it works is the ground. Terminating under a termination clause in the contract is the exercise of a right: follow the notice provision and the contract ends. Terminating for the other side’s breach is a claim, and if the breach was not serious enough to justify it, the party who walked away is the one who repudiated. Those are very different letters and they are the first thing to settle.
The first question is always which ground you are on. A letter that terminates for breach where the contract gave you a simple right to exit on notice makes an easy ending into a dispute.
The contract gives you a right to end it, usually on a stated notice. This is the cleanest route and it is available whether or not the other side has done anything wrong.
The other party has failed in a way that goes to the root of the contract. It ends the agreement, but if the breach was not serious enough, the party who walked away is the one who repudiated.
Something outside both parties has made performance impossible or radically different. Force majeure depends on what the clause says; frustration is narrow and is not simply "this became expensive".
Both sides agree to end it. This is a different document, a termination agreement rather than a notice, and it is the tidiest ending there is.
Leverage best deals offered by the industry leaders and experience mutual growth.












Still have a question? Our team is happy to help, at no charge and with no obligation to buy anything.
Whatever the contract says. A termination clause almost always sets a period and often a form: in writing, to a named address, sometimes by a specified route.
Not following it is the commonest reason a termination is challenged, and the challenge is usually a good one.
You are then relying on a breach, on frustration, or on the other side agreeing. None of those is as simple as exercising a clause, which is why the drafting starts by reading the contract.
An indefinite contract with no termination provision can often be ended on reasonable notice, but what is reasonable is a matter of the circumstances rather than a fixed period.
Usually more than people expect. Confidentiality obligations, accrued payment obligations, indemnities and the dispute resolution clause commonly continue after the contract ends.
A well-drafted notice says which of these you regard as continuing, so it is not raised for the first time in a dispute.
If the contract says so, yes, and if it says so, an email does not do it.
Where the contract is silent, send it by a route that proves delivery. A notice the other side can say they never received has not been given.
On the right ground, in the form the contract requires.
Get started